Skip to main content

We Must Make The Wise Choice For Our Grandchildren

 We in Staunton have a choice to make.  It is up to us.  Shall we choose solar energy ? Twenty one years ago, I was adopted into the Shenandoah family, Wolf Clan, Oneida Nation of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy (People of the Long House).   White people call them Iroquois. We are taught to listen to our elders, learn to respect and act responsibly. Oren Lyons, 93, Wolf Clan, is an Onondaga Chief, and world leader of peace who teaches —  The Earth is our Mother.  She gives everything we need for life.  Imagine a living pine tree clinging to a cliff; getting all it needs for life from the earth.  We are like that pine tree.  Our Mother Earth provides, but time is running out.  We have little time to make changes in order to survive.  The economy of nations will be broken by natural disasters.  We see more disasters every year:  hurricanes, snow melt, coastlines washing into the seas, wild fires, drought, flooding, on and on.  The haze today brings this reality to Staunton, VA. We must fol
Post a Comment

Democracy and Ben Cline: Regarding his January 5, 2020 Statement

We seem to disagree on almost everything. But this is actually not the case; there is much on
which we agree, and that agreement is key to electing representatives who actually serve our interests.

We agree on the importance of preserving democracy, even as we disagree on the nature of the threats to democracy. We also agree on the essential elements of our democracy. Two of them are the rule of law and the separation of power. Our Congressional representative, Ben Cline, has shown his willingness to subvert both.

Consider his Jan 5, 2020 statement objecting to Congressional acceptance of state certified election returns: “…rules and procedures established by the state Legislatures were deliberately changed by a number of individuals, including governors, secretaries of state, elections officials, judges, and private parties. These changes are in direct violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution. That usurpation of the Legislatures' constitutional authority was a primary reason why the 2020 election became riddled with an unprecedented number of allegations of irregularities and improprieties.”

When and how do we know that there has been a “direct violation….of the Constitution” or an “usurpation of Legislatures’ constitutional authority”? When a Congressional representative stands up and says so? In the 2000 and 2016 presidential elections it was Democrats who found the election process unacceptable. Would Mr. Cline have found Democrats justified should they have refused to accept, as he did, certified state returns? I don’t think so. He would have pointed to court decisions supporting the legality of those election results. He would have cited the limited role of Congress to only count the results.

Legislatures make the laws, but they do not judge whether those laws are being followed. This separation of powers is foundational to the rule of law. The courts determine what our laws, including the constitution, mean in practice. In a democracy, how could it be any other way? If the Legislature made our election laws and then also adjudicated their application, no legislature would ever go out of power – that would not be a “democracy”.

Yes, the 2020 election was “…riddled with an unprecedented number of allegations of irregularities and improprieties…”, but not because there actually was an “…unprecedented number of actual irregularities and improprieties…”. An allegation is not a fact. A lawyer’s argument is not law. The courts determine the facts of the case and their significance for law. In the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, the courts spoke with one unanimous voice; there was no fraud sufficient to alter any vote totals.

I’m sure that Mr. Cline knows these things. Our representatives take an oath to uphold the Constitution, which means, among other things, upholding the separation of powers and the rule of law. Mr. Cline has shown that he would throw them both out of the window for political advantage. He does not deserve re-election.

Dan Stuhlsatz
Staunton

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who has your best interests at heart ?

Are you a senior citizen on Medicare ?  Would you like to pay less for your prescription drugs ? Do you own your own small business?  Would you like to pay less for health insurance for you and your family ? Thinking about buying an electric vehicle, but put off by the cost ?  Would you like to receive an offset from the federal government so you ultimately pay less for it ? Concerned about the federal deficit ?  Wouldn’t it be nice if the fat cats paid their fair share of taxes, instead of enriching themselves via loopholes (yes, I’m pointing at you, Governor Youngkin), so the deficit could be reduced, and not on the backs of middle-class Americans ? Do you enjoy the benefits of easy local access to Shenandoah National Park, and want to see it with cleaner air and water, and upgrades to its infrastructure ? Would you like to see a million or more new jobs created so the country can transition to clean energy sources, so you pay less for transportation and heating and cooling your
1 comment
Read more

WRE and the use of public resources: TIME

At a forum on Tuesday Sept. 13 th , Staunton City School Board candidates weighed in on the possibility of reintroducing Weekly Religious Education (WRE) for public school children. Three candidates clearly supported reintroducing WRE in Staunton public schools: Lisa Hatter, John T. Wilson, and Fontella Brown-Bundy.   Of the three, Mrs. Hatter cited Thomas Jefferson in order to support her position.  As she put it, Jefferson saw the “wall between church and state” as a one-way process.  Citizens bring their religious views into civil life through their participation in public institutions; however, the government cannot promote religion to its citizens.   Isn’t Mrs. Hatter’s take on Jefferson a very strong argument against WRE, rather than for it?  Why?   Her description of this one-way process assumes that no public school system resources are used to promote religious practice.  This is not the case with WRE.  While our courts have decided that WRE satisfies the legal requirements
Post a Comment
Read more

Abortion: Don’t tread on me or my values

While he may not want to talk about it, it’s no secret that Ben Cline is staunchly anti-abortion, believing that human life begins at conception and, accordingly, that a woman has no right to terminate a pregnancy. He has signed onto proposed legislation prohibiting abortions nationwide, with no exceptions for rape, incest or protecting the life or health of the mother. He has also voted against a law safeguarding the use of contraceptives like birth control pills to prevent pregnancy. I certainly can respect another’s deeply-held moral or religious beliefs, Mr. Cline being a conservative Catholic. What I do object to, however, is having him or anyone else impose those beliefs on me and oblige me to conform to them. If a couple is unable to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, they can face catastrophic consequences, and their lives can be devastated. A child may demand a level of financial, emotional and material support completely beyond the ability of the couple to provide. The end result
Post a Comment
Read more