Skip to main content

We Must Make The Wise Choice For Our Grandchildren

 We in Staunton have a choice to make.  It is up to us.  Shall we choose solar energy ? Twenty one years ago, I was adopted into the Shenandoah family, Wolf Clan, Oneida Nation of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy (People of the Long House).   White people call them Iroquois. We are taught to listen to our elders, learn to respect and act responsibly. Oren Lyons, 93, Wolf Clan, is an Onondaga Chief, and world leader of peace who teaches —  The Earth is our Mother.  She gives everything we need for life.  Imagine a living pine tree clinging to a cliff; getting all it needs for life from the earth.  We are like that pine tree.  Our Mother Earth provides, but time is running out.  We have little time to make changes in order to survive.  The economy of nations will be broken by natural disasters.  We see more disasters every year:  hurricanes, snow melt, coastlines washing into the seas, wild fires, drought, flooding, on and...
Post a Comment

WRE and the issue of security

At a forum on Tuesday Sept. 13th, Staunton City School Board candidates weighed in on two timely issues.  All five of the candidates called for strategies that would increase our students’ safety and security.  In addition, three candidates - Fontella Brown-Bundy, Lisa Hatter and John T. Wilson – called for the reintroduction of Weekly Religious Education (WRE).  (Stephanie Mason did not support WRE; Kristin Seigel did not support releasing students for WRE during the school day.)


I find it difficult to understand how a candidate could support WRE and also increased security.  It seems that WRE would introduce a significant security challenge, a challenge which the school system would be constitutionally unable to meet.  This is because of the way that WRE must be organized.


Staunton’s most recent version of WRE, discontinued in 2015, “released” public school students through third grade for religious instruction for an hour each week during the middle of the school day.  This program extended through the entire school year.  Public school staff escorted students to the school property line at which point WRE staff took them to a nearby church for religious instruction.  The public schools took no part in recruitment or curriculum; parents had to “opt in” in order for their children to participate.


These are some of the arrangements necessary in order to satisfy our courts that WRE meets the constitutional requirement that public schools refrain from promoting religious practice.  As far as the law is concerned, this strategy washes the public schools’ hands from responsibility for the “released” students, making WRE constitutionally acceptable.  This strategy also eliminates the schools’ ability to ensure student welfare and security.


Whatever the law may say, I think that you would agree with me that parents and community would, and should, hold the school system responsible if children were harmed while attending a WRE program.  Wouldn’t you hold the school system responsible for harm to your child?  After all, the schools would have made that harm possible in the first place by introducing WRE instruction without the capacity to also provide for student security.  


When you think about it, this responsibility actually extends further, to each one of us, as citizens who are responsible for electing a school board to oversee our schools.  Before choosing school board members that support the reintroduction of WRE, we should first think very carefully about what this means for achieving the public school’s mission, part of which is to ensure student welfare and security.


Dan Stuhlsatz

Staunton

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who has your best interests at heart ?

Are you a senior citizen on Medicare ?  Would you like to pay less for your prescription drugs ? Do you own your own small business?  Would you like to pay less for health insurance for you and your family ? Thinking about buying an electric vehicle, but put off by the cost ?  Would you like to receive an offset from the federal government so you ultimately pay less for it ? Concerned about the federal deficit ?  Wouldn’t it be nice if the fat cats paid their fair share of taxes, instead of enriching themselves via loopholes (yes, I’m pointing at you, Governor Youngkin), so the deficit could be reduced, and not on the backs of middle-class Americans ? Do you enjoy the benefits of easy local access to Shenandoah National Park, and want to see it with cleaner air and water, and upgrades to its infrastructure ? Would you like to see a million or more new jobs created so the country can transition to clean energy sources, so you pay less ...
1 comment
Read more

Abortion: Don’t tread on me or my values

While he may not want to talk about it, it’s no secret that Ben Cline is staunchly anti-abortion, believing that human life begins at conception and, accordingly, that a woman has no right to terminate a pregnancy. He has signed onto proposed legislation prohibiting abortions nationwide, with no exceptions for rape, incest or protecting the life or health of the mother. He has also voted against a law safeguarding the use of contraceptives like birth control pills to prevent pregnancy. I certainly can respect another’s deeply-held moral or religious beliefs, Mr. Cline being a conservative Catholic. What I do object to, however, is having him or anyone else impose those beliefs on me and oblige me to conform to them. If a couple is unable to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, they can face catastrophic consequences, and their lives can be devastated. A child may demand a level of financial, emotional and material support completely beyond the ability of the couple to provide. The end result...
Post a Comment
Read more

WRE and the use of public resources: TIME

At a forum on Tuesday Sept. 13 th , Staunton City School Board candidates weighed in on the possibility of reintroducing Weekly Religious Education (WRE) for public school children. Three candidates clearly supported reintroducing WRE in Staunton public schools: Lisa Hatter, John T. Wilson, and Fontella Brown-Bundy.   Of the three, Mrs. Hatter cited Thomas Jefferson in order to support her position.  As she put it, Jefferson saw the “wall between church and state” as a one-way process.  Citizens bring their religious views into civil life through their participation in public institutions; however, the government cannot promote religion to its citizens.   Isn’t Mrs. Hatter’s take on Jefferson a very strong argument against WRE, rather than for it?  Why?   Her description of this one-way process assumes that no public school system resources are used to promote religious practice.  This is not the case with WRE.  While our courts ...
Post a Comment
Read more